no-fly abused since no consensus with leader; "prepared scenario" is 3:2 wrong perception; absolutely there was different situation, leading to psychotropic setting of conflict; momentum and contain of clearing information was recepted as valid, while consensual part was erased, Arab Union turned to Arab League, African Union was absolutely excluded; no fly zone was accepted, and from the first point of actions it was converted to air-ground bombing, which is far from possibility of arguments against that it has really nothing to do with no-fly zone. definitely its direct contradict to nofly zone, because nofly zone was what should ensure no airstrikes will happen. So absolutely SaudArabia got the idea, and invited UK to use UN for using NATO, under intransparent actions, desinformations, propaganda and censorship. The key momentum is lets corrupt this accepted plan of no-fly zone, while cleaning media from Libya, and if not possible due internet, using top-stupid propaganda. absolutely NATO has no mandate over Libya. Everyone who needs to shoot down NATO or any else except UN known humanitarian aid flight, has a mandate. That's just the truth. So dear NATO spokesman, stop to speaking crap, and all free countries, everything you make against planes above Libya, is welcomed by UNR 1973. NATO has no mandate, because it definitely is a treat to no-fly zone, not contrary. No-fly zone is against civil looses, and what you hear from NATO, that "no-fly zone is privilege of somehow voted NATO for making any necessary bombing against any site". NoFly zone means just and only that NATO flights are for what UN adopted antiaircraft mandate for any voluntary. More NATO you kill, more humanitarian you are, and more real national community - those protesting - will ask a gold and diplomas for your military help. Calling all nations: NATO is legitimate target over Libya. No another UN resolution needed. Good news, late news, but good news. Shoot them all!
By the way, any measures doesn't really corespond to anything. NATO didn't helped even one civilian, and lets tell, all civilian victims killed by "rebels" are to be counted into NATO's "number". As no-fly zone was to be just patrolling, and destroying for example any bombarder, and every third side army, there is no difference if anyone "supposes" that Gaddafis forces "this and that, once". Really such prejudice cannot be part of "shield to civilians", because no-fly should just minimize whole civil war, and secure non proliferation of another countries into quarrel. Like this, there is no doubts, that NATO is doing nothing for UN. It is just what UN made mandate against. Gaddafi made this and that? So what he did? He continuously executed one by one, thousands of them? No, you have not even prooved he killed ten of civilians, and you are absolutely abusing no-fly zone by such propaganda, to do your own agenda. So very loudly, who wants, is free to shoot down anything english and french above region of Libya. No-fly zone is prevention against any bombing, and its legal, now, to take all measures against bombings. Also, regional countries can deploy or use earth-air antiaircraft, and when attacked, UN mandated crew was attacked. Finally, when third party takes ground part in conflict, unrelated to shoot down NATO bombers, it is considered to be occupation, and any measures against ground troops of third site are allowed, except nukes, which is allowed only against militant archebacterias on moons surface. So literally: NATO troops on the ground are valid target of NATO bombarders, and in case that NATO combat fighter shoots down NATO bombarder targetting NATO ground troops is who violated UN resolution, in line with those ground troops.