IRNA/30518564 - Those words are positive. But before anything of this, Islam has to win back its neutral position. It means Arab and Islamic nations must deliver unbiased image and positive culture and values to "consumers of West", or in other words, Islam has to win the fight against many governments and media installations, and even speakers and bookwriters (why for example is writing antiislamic "briefly on Islam" books such profitable bussiness? starting with in-box "sharia knowledge", going through "complex Israel" history literature, and ending in "Woman vs. Iran" literature, which is properly said only branche of literature participating on Iran corpus matches). Islamic and Arabic means currently "dangerous" and Alien, yes, with great A. So this is what Islam and various brotherly ethnics must fight against. It is though pretty multidimensional war to be won: for example someone has to deliver classical persian literature, and modern persian books to German, French, Russian, Czech, Magyar and English languages, in order to push away those titles, which do occupy Iran topic place in libraries just because their VIP tag from CIA and similar. If there was quality and confidentiality based channel to deliver such books, those propaganda books would just "took their way from library to recyclation unit, as they would normally deserved in capitalist-oriented book trade, if under proper concurence". Next thing can be media: in west you should have your own media, which could address internal affairs of host countries properly, media possessing deeper cultural insight of their customers, and even media able to provide innovative quality oriented but also coming with powerful marketing strategy. These media could then patrol teritory, where now commercial and state owned media spread any particular mud about Arabs, Muslims, Nations, Events and Minorities, mud currently needed in any colonial agenda. You can draw every element of war for dealienation of muslim image yourself, but it seems to me this also needs before all focus of Muslim Unity, and particularily Unity of independent nations, which is able to stand for Muslims in their modern fight, fight against for long period untreated cancer of disinformation. I think all that iceberg Alien bias over Muslim and Arab world is just and only incoherent and unintegrated pile of use-and-forget or "consume-age" propaganda. Noone judicious would suppose, that there is "undefeatable", deep and structured conspiracy of lies behind spit on Muslims life. But as it is huge amount of trash, noone should either think, that defeating particular trash makes the rest to fall as house of cards. Liquidation of this bias needs unity, strategy, solidarity, wisdom, great amount of dimplomacy, and also passion in any detail of greater image, which needs infinite tenacity. It is not like fighting genious rats in hospital, its more like cleaning disasterously infinite fields of waste. When Muslim Unity defeats this hellish case, then it will be able to extend unity with non-muslim nations - and then final solution for Somalia, which is not alone, but which is exemplary of its type, will be possible.
related (Somalia vs. Capitalism):
related (Somalia vs. Capitalism):
Note again, that Somalia is that part of global-capitalism equation, which can't be resolved until capitalism itself is removed, socially upgraded, or downgraded to "alternative" engine. When Somali people are needed in some process, problem of this nation is solved. It means that global-capitalism is only enemy of Somali people. Because there is no pragmatic solution to nation, which lacks any infrastructure or stable food system: noone is so good and wealthy to provide work to Somalis, with all necessary infrastructural, agricultural and bussiness solutions, and bringing them work without that is nonsense. Finally I don't want to underestimate Muslim nations, neither I want to draw them selfish, but I really think it is not in their power to bring all prerequisity equipment to Somalies. It would be difficult in times of peace and cooperation, and it must be just impossible in times around us today. Of course when gold currency would be introduced for Africa, and another for Asia, then it would be just easy to deliver for example Great Man Made River to Somalia - as "by the way, Somalies!". But in current conditions comprehensive constructions in Somalia lead by single nation would led to exhausting of that nation. (actual IRNA movie on Somalia)
IRNA/30518615 - This reminds of "Laden hunt". Man gets feeling that only purpose of these arrogant steps of US towards Afghan-Pakistan is to break their self-confidence - eo ipso moral - of brotherly nations governments. In case of Laden hunt, great spectre accross parliament and security forces was directly humiliated, as they watched that "big brother has bigger gun". In case of US-Taleban talks, even if we leave-behind conspirative doubts, great brother spits to face by "we wanted to ease Afghanistan way". It's again seeding bad feelings in Afghan leadership, which may not be felt by anyone else. Finally its possible too, that Afghan authorities could once ease the way for Taleban-US talks, but current version is pretty funny, considering face of US in anyones eyes in region, or in Asia generally.
related (Military training needed):
Single thing I have very big problem to digest is "US inking" rights in internal affairs of third sites globally, "US consulting" very each decision which is possible to terminologically undermine and put under suspection, "US establishing democracy" here and there (if US was individual and Democracy Beauty, it would be very easy to make quick psychological conclusions from air) and "US training" soldiers and security forces - which US can afford, where it already implemented whole serie of its "" missions. For example I wouldn't feel comfortable, if leaders of my country claimed, that "our military is dust-and-smoke without US training" (I don't feel comfortable either, czech government has, compared to iranian, 20 year history of undisturbed stealing and successful destruction with silent consensus of everyone). By simple logic, basic knowledge for Pak-Afg soldiers are: 1) experiences from home country 2) military knowledge from national history, 3) strategical and technical knowledge of local terrain, and 4) knowledge of local habits (what is important for any power, which hopes to deal by force with guerilla opposition groups in Pakistan, Afghanistan or India). But weapon operations, new strategies etc, are already second, or third - by importance. Also logically, if higher places and locals cooperated to create comphrehensive evidence for every "surgical" operation, and if from this, based on written routine, military, security intelligence strategies would be delivered, and with that, if weapons would be selected for every scenario, and for every available weapon there would be in-operation experienced forces, and for every foreign weapon there would be enough testing and learning, and if most weapons would be from regional and home industry, then we have already prepared military. And in such scenario military moral is pretty high, because most of its work is based on experience, and no external authority came to teach them. But speaking of some Nation that there is necessary to provide it foreign military training? It is not funny, it is contradictive, it is against fundamental military logic, apparent in Vietnam case, and finally it is proper and deep triple-spit to someone's face. Always when someone needs foreign military training (FMT), it is because he must work with absolutely new arms. Necessity of FMT when result army has "unity problems" is nonsense, because FMT in this case can be successful only as brainwashing, or if nationality of soldiers is humiliated, so that they percieve foreign couch as Merciful. Unity of soldiers is direct result of what is claimed subject of national unity: if governed unit is artificial or governor foreigner, army is weak from its damaged unity. And in this case FMT is triple spit on tree nations. You needn't think too much to name them. But. Just addition, when we are speaking of naavy logic. Never ask again why "colateral damage" is so high. Why? Because when foreign man govern homestead, it would be always change to better, leaving government to local man, except if foreign man is exceptionally good one - that man, who was concluded impossible to meet ever, by Confucio. Give me single reason, for which US soldier should respect non-US people and soil as his own? Because he doesn't understand and never ever will share their culture? Because he has doctrine instead of opinion for regional religion? Because he is most probably fighting shoulder to shoulder with some racists? Or because what started war, which is his mission now, was what it was, and he went to fight with "revanche!" sentiments, while optimal setting of head in these kind of environment and tasks the opposite - "secure!" is needed. Tell me one think which you need to teach your soldiers from this? Do they need to prefer mosqs for preventive attacks? I stand by viewpoint, that just and only special weapons need to be introduced by experienced lectors (implementing special weapon ISW), but also that if this (ISW) is called military training without which forces are useless, not something, but everything and particularly anything else is wrong. When soldier is able to properly manipulate basic weapons, and when he is experienced enough to operate carefuly, respectfuly and securely in mostly civil condition, then he needs nothing else to be tought. Special weapons should be home produced. And whatever, I don't think, that if "US soldiers leave region", that "tribe background of security forces" will lead to "absolute decay of security forces". Because I don't think, that presence of some US soldiers, or US forces generally is the key factor behind joining "tribally divided security". I don't want to shift down moral, you, there, but I guess you will agree, that function of your national security depends more on your salaries, than on presence of "inter-tribal uniting function" of US army or trainers, doesn't it? And maybe on food inflation...